Jan 27, 2008

In Defense of Larry Silverstein, Newspeak to the Rescue

In the PBS documentary America Rebuilds, Larry Silverstein said this about World Trade Center Building 7:

"We’ve had such terrible loss of life, the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they (fire department) made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."

But it turns out Larry did not mean "demolish it" after all! Finally we have an explanation! "Pull" means "evacuate" and "it" means "them"! Thanks to the brilliant linguists who solved this mystery. He was talking about the evacuation of firefighters. Surely now the absurd conspiracy theory has been put to rest.

Here are some examples of this newspeak in action:

Example 1: "Anyone who tells you there were no bombs in WTC 7 is evacuating your leg."
Example 2: "Larry evacuated off a 7 billion dollar insurance scam."
Example 3: "The PBS documentary 'America Rebuilds' featuring Larry Silverstein, was evacuated off the shelves."

It is especially important for firefighters and other emergency workers to understand this newspeak - lives may be at stake. To evacuate a group of people from, say, a burning theater, one would no longer say "let's get them out" or "let's evacuate those people". Instead say "let's pull it" and you will have communicated the same idea much more effectively. Don't worry, once everyone is hip to the new lingo they will know exactly what you mean.

Newspeak also allows you the flexibility to combine two unrelated events into one sentence. For example, "They made that decision to pull (evacuate) and then we watched the building collapse."

Larry's sentence starts with the decision to evacuate the building. The evacuation was completed by 11 am according to both NIST and FEMA.

Then he concludes the same sentence with a reference to the building's collapse at 5:20 pm - a separate event more than 6 hours later! In the same sentence! Amazing! The documentary cuts from Larry's famous quote straight to footage of the collapsing Building 7. I guess they didn’t have any footage of the evacuation.

So the next time someone asks why there was molten iron exclusively under the three buildings that fell at free-fall speed that day, or why Giuliani said on CNN “we were told that the building was going to collapse”, or why BBC’s Jane Standley reported the collapse of building 7 half an hour too early, or why Larry Silverstein would purchase properties previously slated for demolition being prohibitively expensive to get up to code, just say “evacuate your head out of your ass”. This newspeak is surely preferable to the oldspeak practiced in past centuries.

Pete Swann
DayjobOrchestra.Com

To discover a conspiracy by government is to simultaneously discover a conspiracy
by media. CBS in 1988 found that 90% of Americans think that JFK was killed by US officials. Most of them believe the CIA did it. But no mainstream journalist has ever championed the cause of those 90%. Even 40 years later, Peter Jennings' special on JFK would not dare to mention any evidence of CIA involvement. Many of the JFK files are still under lock and key to this day.

As with JFK, the media will not challenge the official 9/11 orthodoxy. The rule in MSM is "don't question 9/11 if you want to keep your job on TV". There are no exceptions. Bill Maher shows his "political correctness" on the 9/11 issue, enthusiastically maintaining the myth, while Rosie was given the choice to keep her job on The View, or keep talking about 9/11. Thankfully she chose the later.

Hardly any truthers trust the news on TV, or the mainstream media in general. We know the news is complicit with government tyranny, so the only question with regard to 9/11 is, how far down the rabbit hole do we go? If it took five years to discover that BBC's Jane Standley had reported the collapse of building 7 half an hour prematurely, maybe there's even more to learn about the media and 9/11.

Naturally, we truthers hate the Fox-style straw man arguments which associate us with
holocaust deniers and terrorists. In the same way, those in the "orthodox" truth movement must be careful not to hastily accuse those with new and unusual theories of being double agents.

There are claims that those who support the "no-planes theory" (NPT) are acting covertly for the CIA, Cointel pro or some other disinformation group to divide and weaken the movement. The claim is generally made that no-planers endorse the hologram plane theory. But the popular NPT movies, September Clues, 9/11 Taboo, and 9/11 Amateur do not rely on, or even mention hologram planes. Before making accusations and assigning labels, we should look at these people and their media case by case. Professor James Fetzer who founded Scholars for 9/11 Truth is likely not a disinfo agent. He does however consider the fake news theory to be proven, and the NPT compelling.

Morgan Reynolds, former chief economist for the US Department of Labor believes that space based energy beam weapons brought down the towers, but he has not been accused by the 9/11 truth community of being a disinfo agent. Michael Ruppert writes of an oil shortage while Webster Tarpley contends that the shortage is manufactured along with the terrorism. Ron Paul is the best solution for creeping fascism in America, but he prefers the blowback theory to MIHOP or LIHOP. So let’s not forget that well meaning experts will legitimately disagree with eachother.

Consider that a person may be aware that moon landing pictures were faked, while still
believing that the lunar landings were real. Similarly, it is possible to observe the 9/11 news
fakery without having to believe that this was done to create a plane out of nothing. Here is the key point; you don't have to be a no-planer to see the news fakery. There may be other reasons for it. I have heard theories including; the news was faked to disguise modified airliners, to hide other aircraft in the area, to hide subsequent explosions in the buildings, to create maximum shock and awe Hollywood style, etc.

But these amount to mere conjecture, so I stick to what I can see with my own eyes - the original live broadcasts of the South Tower hit do not agree with each other. NBC's live chopper footage shows no plane where there clearly should be one, CBS footage shows a much steeper descent than all the other networks and Michael Hezarkhani's footage (CNN) is taken from an impossible location. These are just a few of the anomalies. I did not take this information on faith, I built a 3D computer model of the buildings, planes and camera positions shown on the various networks to verify the visual anomalies for myself. The evidence came gift wrapped from the networks themselves, and is in no short supply, thanks to thousands of VCRs which started rolling after the North Tower was struck.

To ignore the obvious news fakery for fear of being associated with the no-planers crowd
makes as much sense as ignoring the 9/11 cover up for fear of upsetting the establishment. The way I figure it, a truther should fear no truth. I don't think the mainstream media, still trusted by millions, should get a pass without some reasonable explanation for the anomalies. I made a film called "South Tower Anomalies III" about NBC’s news broadcasts on 9/11 because the news fakery is immediately provable, and because people ought to know what kind of mind control TV excercises every day.

I encourage influential truthers to have your own trusted video experts, graphics experts and researchers analyze the original news broadcasts of the South Tower impact. If you find no anomalies, then the right thing to do is publish a debunking of the fake news theory. But if you do find the inconsistencies described above, the right thing to do is report on it. If we prove the use of faked live news on 9/11, we prove foreknowledge, mass media complicity in mass murder and ultimately MIHOP, without even having to prove NPT.

Pete Swann, Toronto 9/11 Truth
dayjoborchestra.com